Editorial Standards: How We Write About Protoflow

We follow seven rules, and each page is checked against them before publishing.

1. The label wins. If the label, the sales page and a brief disagree, we use the label and list the conflict.
2. Sales claims appear only in quotes. We answer each one with evidence.
3. Every health fact has a named source, and we say when a source was not read in full.
4. We never call Protoflow a treatment for an enlarged prostate or any other condition.
5. We never tell readers to stop or change a medicine.
6. We publish no ratings, counts or reviewer names that we cannot verify.
7. We use no pressure tactics: no countdowns, stock warnings or struck-through prices.

These rules come from our reading of the FTC's guidance on health claims, which says that claims should rest on competent and reliable scientific evidence and that a disclaimer does not fix a misleading claim (FTC, Health Products Compliance Guidance).

We avoid words that promise a result or imply agency approval, because they are either false or unsupported for this product.

We also avoid urgency. A page that says "only three left" or counts down to a price change pushes you to decide before you have read. The FTC lists hidden terms and pressure as features of problem offers (FTC, Free trials and tribulations). We prefer plain verbs: the label says, the study found, the sales page claims. We use "may" when a source says may, and we do not turn "may" into "does".

When we describe a symptom, we do not diagnose. A weak stream or night-time trips can have many causes, and we say so, then point to a doctor. That habit costs us some clicks, and we think it is the right trade.

We quote them exactly, label them as the seller's words and put the evidence next to them.

When the sales page says a product “supports the normal functions of the bladder, prostate and reproductive system”, we print those words in quotes, say that no study backs them, and give what the research found. We do the same for the vegan, filler-free and gluten-free claims, which the label does not support. We do not repeat claims in our own voice, even softened, because a reader skimming a page may take a repeated claim for a finding.

We apply the same rule to testimonials. They are one person's account, and the FTC says they do not support health claims on their own (FTC, Health Products Compliance Guidance). Testimonials about sleeping through the night are sales claims here.

We correct errors as soon as we confirm them, show the update date on the page and keep the old claim out of the text.

If you spot an error, email [email protected] with the page, the passage and the source that shows the problem. We check it against the label and the source. If you are right, we fix the page and update the date. We also review pages when new evidence appears, such as a new trial or an agency notice, and we recheck prices on the sales page before each update.

Our review date for this standards page is October 19, 2026.